Search for: All records

Identifying thermodynamically stable crystal structures remains a key challenge in materials chemistry. Computational crystal structure prediction (CSP) workflows typically rank candidate structures by lattice energy to assess relative stability. Approaches using self-consistent first-principles calculations become prohibitively expensive, especially when millions of energy evaluations are required for complex molecular systems with many atoms per unit cell. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of our methodology and results from the seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction organized by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). We present an approach that significantly accelerates CSP by training target-specific machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs). AIMNet2 MLIPs are trained on density functional theory (DFT) calculations of molecular clusters, herein referred to as n-mers. We demonstrate that potentials trained on gas phase dispersion-corrected DFT reference data of n-mers successfully extend to crystalline environments, accurately characterizing the CSP landscape and correctly ranking structures by relative stability. Our methodology effectively captures the underlying physics of thermodynamic crystal stability using only molecular cluster data, avoiding the need for expensive periodic calculations. The performance of target-specific AIMNet2 interatomic potentials is illustrated across diverse chemical systems relevant to pharmaceutical, optoelectronic, and agrochemical applications, demonstrating their promise as efficient alternatives to full DFT calculations for routine CSP tasks. 

In this work, we combined Deep Docking and free energy MD simulations for the in silico screening and experimental validation for potential inhibitors of leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) targeting the WD40 repeat (WDR) domain. 

De novo design of molecules with targeted properties represents a new frontier in molecule development. Despite enormous progress, two main challenges remain: (i) generating novel molecules conditioned on targeted, continuous property values; (ii) obtaining molecules with property values beyond the range in the training data. To tackle these challenges, we propose a reinforced regressional and conditional generative adversarial network (RRCGAN) to generate chemically valid molecules with targeted HOMO–LUMO energy gap (ΔEH–L) as a proof-of-concept study. As validated by density functional theory (DFT) calculation, 75% of the generated molecules have a relative error (RE) of <20% of the targeted ΔEH–L values. To bias the generation toward the ΔEH–L values beyond the range of the original training molecules, transfer learning was applied to iteratively retrain the RRCGAN model. After just two iterations, the mean ΔEH–L of the generated molecules increases to 8.7 eV from the mean value of 5.9 eV shown in the initial training dataset. Qualitative and quantitative analyses reveal that the model has successfully captured the underlying structure–property relationship, which agrees well with the established physical and chemical rules. These results present a trustworthy, purely data-driven methodology for the highly efficient generation of novel molecules with different targeted properties. 

A sensitive model captures the reactivity cliffs but overfit to yield outliers. On the other hand, a robust model disregards the yield outliers but underfits the reactivity cliffs. 

The rapid development and large body of literature on machine learning potentials (MLPs) can make it difficult to know how to proceed for researchers who are not experts but wish to use these tools. The spirit of this review is to help such researchers by serving as a practical, accessible guide to the state-of-the-art in MLPs. This review paper covers a broad range of topics related to MLPs, including (i) central aspects of how and why MLPs are enablers of many exciting advancements in molecular modeling, (ii) the main underpinnings of different types of MLPs, including their basic structure and formalism, (iii) the potentially transformative impact of universal MLPs for both organic and inorganic systems, including an overview of the most recent advances, capabilities, downsides, and potential applications of this nascent class of MLPs, (iv) a practical guide for estimating and understanding the execution speed of MLPs, including guidance for users based on hardware availability, type of MLP used, and prospective simulation size and time, (v) a manual for what MLP a user should choose for a given application by considering hardware resources, speed requirements, energy and force accuracy requirements, as well as guidance for choosing pre-trained potentials or fitting a new potential from scratch, (vi) discussion around MLP infrastructure, including sources of training data, pre-trained potentials, and hardware resources for training, (vii) summary of some key limitations of present MLPs and current approaches to mitigate such limitations, including methods of including long-range interactions, handling magnetic systems, and treatment of excited states, and finally (viii) we finish with some more speculative thoughts on what the future holds for the development and application of MLPs over the next 3-10+ years. 

The rapid development and large body of literature on machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) can make it difficult to know how to proceed for researchers who are not experts but wish to use these tools. The spirit of this review is to help such researchers by serving as a practical, accessible guide to the state-of-the-art in MLIPs. This review paper covers a broad range of topics related to MLIPs, including (i) central aspects of how and why MLIPs are enablers of many exciting advancements in molecular modeling, (ii) the main underpinnings of different types of MLIPs, including their basic structure and formalism, (iii) the potentially transformative impact of universal MLIPs for both organic and inorganic systems, including an overview of the most recent advances, capabilities, downsides, and potential applications of this nascent class of MLIPs, (iv) a practical guide for estimating and understanding the execution speed of MLIPs, including guidance for users based on hardware availability, type of MLIP used, and prospective simulation size and time, (v) a manual for what MLIP a user should choose for a given application by considering hardware resources, speed requirements, energy and force accuracy requirements, as well as guidance for choosing pre-trained potentials or fitting a new potential from scratch, (vi) discussion around MLIP infrastructure, including sources of training data, pre-trained potentials, and hardware resources for training, (vii) summary of some key limitations of present MLIPs and current approaches to mitigate such limitations, including methods of including long-range interactions, handling magnetic systems, and treatment of excited states, and finally (viii) we finish with some more speculative thoughts on what the future holds for the development and application of MLIPs over the next 3–10+ years. 

Abstract Atomistic simulation has a broad range of applications from drug design to materials discovery. Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become an efficient alternative to computationally expensive ab initio simulations. For this reason, chemistry and materials science would greatly benefit from a general reactive MLIP, that is, an MLIP that is applicable to a broad range of reactive chemistry without the need for refitting. Here we develop a general reactive MLIP (ANI-1xnr) through automated sampling of condensed-phase reactions. ANI-1xnr is then applied to study five distinct systems: carbon solid-phase nucleation, graphene ring formation from acetylene, biofuel additives, combustion of methane and the spontaneous formation of glycine from early earth small molecules. In all studies, ANI-1xnr closely matches experiment (when available) and/or previous studies using traditional model chemistry methods. As such, ANI-1xnr proves to be a highly general reactive MLIP for C, H, N and O elements in the condensed phase, enabling high-throughput in silico reactive chemistry experimentation.